Metropolis Signage & Onboarding

The goal

Create a clearer, more consistent signage system that statistically improves first-time user registration, reduces friction at entry, and strengthens the bridge between the physical and digital touch points.

My role

Design lead

Duration

9 months

Team

1 Project Manager

1 Product Designer

2 Copywriters

1 Director of Ops

Context

line

Metropolis averages 40-55,000 first-time users every day.

On average, 13.4% of these users don’t sign up (non-compliant) on payable parking visits.

Signage at our 4,500+ parking locations is the key entry point into onboarding and signing up.

The problem – disconnected physical and digital touch points

line

For first time users, the first interaction with Metropolis doesn't happen with a digital touchpoint, it happens in the physical environment which then leads to our digital product.

 

If a user fails to onboard via our signage, they experience friction at the exit and have to text-to-pay while waiting at the exit and Metropolis doesn't convert these drivers into becoming Metropolis members.

 

Without proper physical touch points, users may never reach the digital touch points and Metropolis misses an opportunity to scale its user base.

Signage issues brought to life at San Antonio Airport

line

Metropolis’s first launch in the aviation space at San Antonio Airport revealed experience issues worth addressing.

 

Data revealed experience gaps and issues post-launch: High % of manual gate vends at exit and lower than average first-time user conversion. Stakeholders involved in the launch mentioned users were having difficulty with our signage package at San Antonio.

 

With 11 million annual passengers and 9,700 spaces, parking accounts for about 60% of revenue. I went to San Antonio a few weeks post-launch to assess what’s wrong. It came down to three key themes.

Placement

Hidden sight lines due to large SUVs.

Messaging

“Pay by phone” messaging doesn’t imply paying for parking.

Messaging

Prominent “Just drive in” implies free parking and/or no action needed until exit.

Placement

Signs blend in with other stimuli.

Placement

Poor placement causing congestion/backing up at exit.

Quantity

Add additional signs to moments of passive time, like in the garage elevator and shuttle.

The Metropolis signage problem

line

Messaging

Signage messaging was inconsistent and unclear. Copy like “First time?” “Pay by phone” and “Just drive in” created confusion, especially when surrounded by other visual noise at the site. Instead of prompting action, the messaging often misled users or failed to signal that any action was required.

Placement

Even the best message fails if it’s not seen. Many signs were placed outside natural sight lines (e.g. too low for drivers or blocked by vehicles) and missed opportunities in key high foot traffic areas or areas with passive time. In some cases, the right message appeared at the wrong moment in the user journey, reducing its impact.

Quantity

There aren’t always enough signs to create a continuous, guided experience. Users might see a message at entry but lose direction once they moved through the lot or toward their destination. Signage should extend beyond the parking zone, following how people actually move through the space.

Testing new signage messaging

line

Partnering with our copywriters, I ran multiple unmoderated A/B tests with participants comparing new messaging against current signage messaging at key moments (entry, exit, and sign-up).

 

The research goal: identify the most intuitive messaging that helps new users successfully onboard into our product.

 

I learned through multiple rounds that not every message belongs on a sign. And finding the right balance between what’s communicated physically and what’s reinforced digitally made for a clearer user journey. It’s about messaging at the right time.

The result – Entrance

line

The result – Sign Up

line

The result – Exit

line

Sharing findings and recommendations to San Antonio stakeholders

line

I shared an updated package with San Antonio stakeholders for review and approval.

San Antonio Airport result

line

Average first-time visit registration increased 4.2% at SAT since new signage package was deployed.

– Ed Krafcik, VP of Aviation

Dayton International Airport, our second aviation site, launched shortly after with these updated signs.

Bridging the physical and digital – signage insights informing onboarding work streams

line

Insights from the signage study revealed that some of the messaging or information users were seeking from signage can be addressed in our digital onboarding flow – another work stream. I partnered with the other product designer and shared my learnings around instructional and value messaging. This is all for the bigger goal of ensuring we're introducing the right information at the right time in the greater user journey.

Onboarding Recommendation 1

Create clarity around allowing multiple drivers for one vehicle.

Onboarding Recommendation 2

Provide email as an option to get receipts.

Onboarding Recommendation 3

Provide more clarity and trust around Metropolis technology and the long term value our product provides.

Partnering to improve onboarding conversion & effectiveness

line

Data revealed a significant drop-off after the landing page in our onboarding flow.

 

To better understand user perception, I partnered with the product designer on the Visit Experience team to run a survey using the new signage entry point and current onboarding flow. Results showed that 38% of participants believed they’d need to onboard every time they parked, highlighting that our messaging was still unclear.

Heap metrics of our onboarding show a severe drop-off after the landing page.

Onboarding

line

Working with marketing, product, and design, several work streams were added to the product roadmap to address onboarding improvements based on my signage testing insights. We’re exploring ways to consolidate the landing page to combine value messaging and the first input field. email address opt-in, and where value and information messaging resonates with users the most in the flow

 

All efforts have the the goal of improving conversion and getting more users to sign up and educating the new user on the product and the value it provides.

Stephen Lynn

Next project

© 2026

Metropolis Signage & Onboarding

The goal

Create a clearer, more consistent signage system that statistically improves first-time user registration, reduces friction at entry, and strengthens the bridge between the physical and digital touch points.

My role

Design lead

Duration

9 months

Team

1 Project Manager

1 Product Designer

2 Copywriters

1 Director of Ops

Context

line

Metropolis averages 40-55,000 first-time users every day.

On average, 13.4% of these users don’t sign up (non-compliant) on payable parking visits.

Signage at our 4,500+ parking locations is the key entry point into onboarding and signing up.

The problem – disconnected physical and digital touch points

line

For first time users, the first interaction with Metropolis doesn't happen with a digital touchpoint, it happens in the physical environment which then leads to our digital product.

 

If a user fails to onboard via our signage, they experience friction at the exit and have to text-to-pay while waiting at the exit and Metropolis doesn't convert these drivers into becoming Metropolis members.

 

Without proper physical touch points, users may never reach the digital touch points and Metropolis misses an opportunity to scale its user base.

Signage issues brought to life at San Antonio Airport

line

Metropolis’s first launch in the aviation space at San Antonio Airport revealed experience issues worth addressing.

 

Data revealed experience gaps and issues post-launch: High % of manual gate vends at exit and lower than average first-time user conversion. Stakeholders involved in the launch mentioned users were having difficulty with our signage package at San Antonio.

 

With 11 million annual passengers and 9,700 spaces, parking accounts for about 60% of revenue. I went to San Antonio a few weeks post-launch to assess what’s wrong. It came down to three key themes.

Placement

Hidden sight lines due to large SUVs.

Messaging

“Pay by phone” messaging doesn’t imply paying for parking.

Messaging

Prominent “Just drive in” implies free parking and/or no action needed until exit.

Placement

Signs blend in with other stimuli.

Placement

Poor placement causing congestion/backing up at exit.

Quantity

Add additional signs to moments of passive time, like in the garage elevator and shuttle.

The Metropolis signage problem

line

Messaging

Signage messaging was inconsistent and unclear. Copy like “First time?” “Pay by phone” and “Just drive in” created confusion, especially when surrounded by other visual noise at the site. Instead of prompting action, the messaging often misled users or failed to signal that any action was required.

Placement

Even the best message fails if it’s not seen. Many signs were placed outside natural sight lines (e.g. too low for drivers or blocked by vehicles) and missed opportunities in key high foot traffic areas or areas with passive time. In some cases, the right message appeared at the wrong moment in the user journey, reducing its impact.

Quantity

There aren’t always enough signs to create a continuous, guided experience. Users might see a message at entry but lose direction once they moved through the lot or toward their destination. Signage should extend beyond the parking zone, following how people actually move through the space.

Testing new signage messaging

line

Partnering with our copywriters, I ran multiple unmoderated A/B tests with participants comparing new messaging against current signage messaging at key moments (entry, exit, and sign-up).

 

The research goal: identify the most intuitive messaging that helps new users successfully onboard into our product.

 

I learned through multiple rounds that not every message belongs on a sign. And finding the right balance between what’s communicated physically and what’s reinforced digitally made for a clearer user journey. It’s about messaging at the right time.

The result – Entrance

line

The result – Sign Up

line

The result – Exit

line

Sharing findings and recommendations to San Antonio stakeholders

line

I shared an updated package with San Antonio stakeholders for review and approval.

San Antonio Airport result

line

Average first-time visit registration increased 4.2% at SAT since new signage package was deployed.

– Ed Krafcik, VP of Aviation

Dayton International Airport, our second aviation site, launched shortly after with these updated signs.

Bridging the physical and digital – signage insights informing onboarding work streams

line

Insights from the signage study revealed that some of the messaging or information users were seeking from signage can be addressed in our digital onboarding flow – another work stream. I partnered with the other product designer and shared my learnings around instructional and value messaging. This is all for the bigger goal of ensuring we're introducing the right information at the right time in the greater user journey.

Onboarding Recommendation 1

Create clarity around allowing multiple drivers for one vehicle.

Onboarding Recommendation 2

Provide email as an option to get receipts.

Onboarding Recommendation 3

Provide more clarity and trust around Metropolis technology and the long term value our product provides.

Partnering to improve onboarding conversion & effectiveness

line

Data revealed a significant drop-off after the landing page in our onboarding flow.

 

To better understand user perception, I partnered with the product designer on the Visit Experience team to run a survey using the new signage entry point and current onboarding flow. Results showed that 38% of participants believed they’d need to onboard every time they parked, highlighting that our messaging was still unclear.

Heap metrics of our onboarding show a severe drop-off after the landing page.

Onboarding

line

Working with marketing, product, and design, several work streams were added to the product roadmap to address onboarding improvements based on my signage testing insights. We’re exploring ways to consolidate the landing page to combine value messaging and the first input field. email address opt-in, and where value and information messaging resonates with users the most in the flow

 

All efforts have the the goal of improving conversion and getting more users to sign up and educating the new user on the product and the value it provides.

Stephen Lynn

Next project

© 2026

Metropolis Signage & Onboarding

The goal

Create a clearer, more consistent signage system that statistically improves first-time user registration, reduces friction at entry, and strengthens the bridge between the physical and digital touch points.

My role

Design lead

Duration

9 months

Team

1 Project Manager

1 Product Designer

2 Copywriters

1 Director of Ops

Context

line

Metropolis averages 40-55,000 first-time users every day.

On average, 13.4% of these users don’t sign up (non-compliant) on payable parking visits.

Signage at our 4,500+ parking locations is the key entry point into onboarding and signing up.

The problem – disconnected physical and digital touch points

line

For first time users, the first interaction with Metropolis doesn't happen with a digital touchpoint, it happens in the physical environment which then leads to our digital product.

 

If a user fails to onboard via our signage, they experience friction at the exit and have to text-to-pay while waiting at the exit and Metropolis doesn't convert these drivers into becoming Metropolis members.

 

Without proper physical touch points, users may never reach the digital touch points and Metropolis misses an opportunity to scale its user base.

Signage issues brought to life at San Antonio Airport

line

Metropolis’s first launch in the aviation space at San Antonio Airport revealed experience issues worth addressing.

 

Data revealed experience gaps and issues post-launch: High % of manual gate vends at exit and lower than average first-time user conversion. Stakeholders involved in the launch mentioned users were having difficulty with our signage package at San Antonio.

 

With 11 million annual passengers and 9,700 spaces, parking accounts for about 60% of revenue. I went to San Antonio a few weeks post-launch to assess what’s wrong. It came down to three key themes.

Placement

Hidden sight lines due to large SUVs.

Messaging

“Pay by phone” messaging doesn’t imply paying for parking.

Messaging

Prominent “Just drive in” implies free parking and/or no action needed until exit.

Placement

Signs blend in with other stimuli.

Placement

Poor placement causing congestion/backing up at exit.

Quantity

Add additional signs to moments of passive time, like in the garage elevator and shuttle.

The Metropolis signage problem

line

Messaging

Signage messaging was inconsistent and unclear. Copy like “First time?” “Pay by phone” and “Just drive in” created confusion, especially when surrounded by other visual noise at the site. Instead of prompting action, the messaging often misled users or failed to signal that any action was required.

Placement

Even the best message fails if it’s not seen. Many signs were placed outside natural sight lines (e.g. too low for drivers or blocked by vehicles) and missed opportunities in key high foot traffic areas or areas with passive time. In some cases, the right message appeared at the wrong moment in the user journey, reducing its impact.

Quantity

There aren’t always enough signs to create a continuous, guided experience. Users might see a message at entry but lose direction once they moved through the lot or toward their destination. Signage should extend beyond the parking zone, following how people actually move through the space.

Testing new signage messaging

line

Partnering with our copywriters, I ran multiple unmoderated A/B tests with participants comparing new messaging against current signage messaging at key moments (entry, exit, and sign-up).

 

The research goal: identify the most intuitive messaging that helps new users successfully onboard into our product.

 

I learned through multiple rounds that not every message belongs on a sign. And finding the right balance between what’s communicated physically and what’s reinforced digitally made for a clearer user journey. It’s about messaging at the right time.

The result – Entrance

line

The result – Sign Up

line

The result – Exit

line

Sharing findings and recommendations to San Antonio stakeholders

line

I shared an updated package with San Antonio stakeholders for review and approval.

San Antonio Airport result

line

Average first-time visit registration increased 4.2% at SAT since new signage package was deployed.

– Ed Krafcik, VP of Aviation

Dayton International Airport, our second aviation site, launched shortly after with these updated signs.

Bridging the physical and digital – signage insights informing onboarding work streams

line

Insights from the signage study revealed that some of the messaging or information users were seeking from signage can be addressed in our digital onboarding flow – another work stream. I partnered with the other product designer and shared my learnings around instructional and value messaging. This is all for the bigger goal of ensuring we're introducing the right information at the right time in the greater user journey.

Onboarding Recommendation 1

Create clarity around allowing multiple drivers for one vehicle.

Onboarding Recommendation 2

Provide email as an option to get receipts.

Onboarding Recommendation 3

Provide more clarity and trust around Metropolis technology and the long term value our product provides.

Partnering to improve onboarding conversion & effectiveness

line

Data revealed a significant drop-off after the landing page in our onboarding flow.

 

To better understand user perception, I partnered with the product designer on the Visit Experience team to run a survey using the new signage entry point and current onboarding flow. Results showed that 38% of participants believed they’d need to onboard every time they parked, highlighting that our messaging was still unclear.

Heap metrics of our onboarding show a severe drop-off after the landing page.

Onboarding

line

Working with marketing, product, and design, several work streams were added to the product roadmap to address onboarding improvements based on my signage testing insights. We’re exploring ways to consolidate the landing page to combine value messaging and the first input field. email address opt-in, and where value and information messaging resonates with users the most in the flow

 

All efforts have the the goal of improving conversion and getting more users to sign up and educating the new user on the product and the value it provides.

Stephen Lynn

Next project